Refining Secondary Belt Cleaning for Improved Performance
Multiple belt cleaner systems take into consideration the dynamics of the surface of the belt and the nature of the material as it passes around the head pulley.
Ideally, secondary cleaners should contact the belt 50 to 100 millimeters (2 to 4 inches) past the head pulley departure point to effectively scrape against a solid surface for optimal material removal.
Cleaning performance will be less effective if a secondary cleaner is installed in a position where its pressure changes the belt's line of travel.
Constraints such as conveyor structure, space limitations, or mechanical splices may require secondary cleaners to be positioned where material falls into the chute. Installing a secondary cleaner in a manner that alters the belt’s travel line diminishes its cleaning effectiveness. To mitigate this, hold-down rolls or similar devices should be employed to stabilize the belt line.
An angle of 7 to 15 degrees rake in the direction of belt travel maintains cleaning efficiency while allowing easier passage of obstructions.
Secondary cleaners benefit from narrow, independently suspended blades that maintain precise contact with the belt’s changing surface contours. Blades that pivot or rock from side to side adapt instantly to these contours. Studies recommend using individual blades, each 75 to 200 millimeters (3 to 8 inches) wide, for effective secondary cleaning.
To avoid “stripes” of carryback created by gaps between the blades, an overlapping blade pattern, created by an alternating long-arm/short-arm pattern, can be used.
The Bureau of Mines’ study, Basic Parameters of Conveyor Belt Cleaning, identifies initial blade wear occurring where individual blades meet. Material passing through gaps between adjacent blades accelerates wear and allows more carryback. To mitigate this erosive wear, overlapping blade patterns such as alternating long-arm/short-arm configurations or offsetting gaps in two aligned cleaners are recommended.